GUTLESS AND SILENT” — COSIMA TORCHES MARCO RUBIO Over Trump’s Venezuela AgendaIs U.S. power completely unchecked now? 👉 Tap in before this explodes across Washington

GUTLESS AND SILENT” — COSIMA TORCHES MARCO RUBIO Over Trump’s Venezuela AgendaIs U.S. power completely unchecked now?
👉 Tap in before this explodes across Washington

🚨 NO LEGAL BASIS, NO SHAME: COSIMA Unloads on Rubio for Backing Trump’s World-Police Fantasy
👉 COMMENT: Is U.S. power completely unchecked now?
ChatGPT said:
“GUTLESS AND SILENT” — COSIMA TORCHES MARCO RUBIO Over Trump’s Venezuela Agenda
👉 Tap in before this explodes across Washington

Washington is on edge after a blistering public broadside from political commentator COSIMA, who accused Senator Marco Rubio of moral collapse and strategic cowardice for backing President Donald Trump’s aggressive posture toward Venezuela—without, she says, citing any legal foundation.

In a statement already ricocheting through diplomatic and media circles, COSIMA didn’t hedge, didn’t soften, and didn’t apologize. Her message was simple and incendiary: Rubio knows better—and chose silence anyway.

🚨 “NO LEGAL BASIS, NO SHAME”
COSIMA’s core charge cuts straight to the heart of the controversy: there is no clear constitutional or international legal basis for the Trump administration’s escalating Venezuela agenda, yet Rubio—long a vocal hardliner on Latin America—has failed to articulate any justification.

“You couldn’t name a legal basis if your career depended on it,” COSIMA charged, accusing Rubio of abandoning the principles he once claimed to defend.

She argued that Rubio, once a loud critic of executive overreach and reckless foreign entanglements, has transformed into a quiet enabler—not because the policy is sound, but because the politics demand loyalty.

🌍 FROM FOREIGN POLICY TO “WORLD-POLICE FANTASY”
COSIMA framed Trump’s Venezuela strategy as part of a broader pattern: an America acting unilaterally, aggressively, and without guardrails.

According to her, Rubio’s support isn’t about democracy, human rights, or regional stability—it’s about power proximity.

“This isn’t leadership,” she implied. “It’s submission.”

The accusation stings because Rubio built his national profile on foreign policy seriousness. COSIMA’s attack suggests that reputation is now in ruins, replaced by what she called performative toughness paired with strategic emptiness.

🧨 WHY THIS HIT A NERVE
The timing couldn’t be worse for Washington insiders. Global tensions are already high, allies are questioning U.S. motives, and critics warn that unchecked executive power abroad eventually erodes democracy at home.

COSIMA’s remarks have reignited uncomfortable questions:

Who decides when and where the U.S. intervenes?

What happens when Congress stops demanding answers?

And what does silence from senior lawmakers really mean?

⚖️ THE BIGGER QUESTION
This isn’t just about Rubio. It’s about a system where power moves faster than accountability, and loyalty often outweighs law.

COSIMA’s outburst has forced a debate many in Washington would rather avoid—and once it starts, it may not stop.

👉