Wizerunki uczestników Marszu Niepodległości, którzy odpalili race, zostały opublikowane w niecałe 24 godziny. Kiedy zostaną opublikowane wizerunki dywersantów?

Wizerunki uczestników Marszu Niepodległości, którzy odpalili race, zostały opublikowane w niecałe 24 godziny. Kiedy zostaną opublikowane wizerunki dywersantów?

“ — But What About the Saboteurs?
The swift publication of images showing participants of the recent Independence March who lit flares has stirred both public debate and growing frustration. Authorities released the photos in under 24 hours, praising the rapid response as a step toward accountability and public safety.

However, this efficiency has also raised a pressing question: Where are the images of the individuals suspected of deliberate sabotage during the same event?

A Double Standard?
Critics argue that the speed in identifying march participants contrasts sharply with the lack of visible progress in exposing the so-called saboteurs—individuals reportedly responsible for provoking incidents, escalating tensions, or attempting to disrupt the peaceful course of the march.

Opposition voices and activists have pointed out that if law enforcement can identify ordinary citizens in less than a day, the same standard should apply to those who posed a far greater threat to public order.

Public Demands Transparency
Calls for transparency are growing louder. Many citizens want to know:

Who were the provocateurs?

Why hasn’t their footage been published?

Is the investigation being conducted with the same urgency and determination?

Social media has amplified these concerns, with users demanding equal treatment regardless of political narrative or public image.

Authorities Respond Cautiously
Official statements so far emphasize that investigations into sabotage are “ongoing” and “complex,” suggesting that identifying those individuals may require more time. Investigators claim they are analyzing hours of surveillance recordings and cross-referencing materials, but no concrete timeline has been provided.

A Question of Trust
For many, the issue highlights broader concerns about selective justice. Transparency in identifying offenders is essential to maintaining public trust—yet withholding information fuels speculation and deepens divisions.

As the public awaits answers, one thing is clear: the demand for consistency and fairness in law enforcement has never been louder.